paved :: marc weisblott

David Miller leading a ‘Four More Years’ cheer

May 18, 2006 · 7 Comments

clintonianThe official kick-off for David Miller’s effort to remain mayor featured a video message of support from environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Which was perfectly appropriate considering how much the campaign packaging owes to the second term of Bill Clinton, who successfully ignored whatever passed for dissent, while being too charismatic to allow accusations of incompetency to stick. But with the limp launch of Jane Pitfield’s effort to unseat Miller – with shrill remarks about criminals, condos and cadgers – the real competition may yet emerge. “Same Great Mayor. Same Great Hair.” reads one of the posters for the confidently postured candidate, while other tritely acerbic slogans serve to remind us that he’s tall! honest! and nice! The robust crowd at the imitation genuine Steam Whistle Brewery ranged from seasoned veterans of media launch buffet lines to others who appeared to genuinely need the free meal, and drink tickets are always a good motivation to fill out a volunteer form. Miller’s speech provided a soundbite related to every topic he’s dealt with in 30 months on the job: The mayor’s only reference to his opponents came in mentioning how the city was a surprise sliver medalist as Best Employer in the Toronto Sun Readers’ Choice Awards – coming in second to Pizza Pizza, it turns out. Bumper stickers reading i ♥ my mayor reflect his self-assurance in the midst of the urban renaissance that seemed completely unfathomable during the reign of Miller’s predecessor – maybe the 2003 indictment from Mel Lastman, “You’ll never be Mayor of Toronto because you say dumb and stupid things”, deserves a place on the campaign literature, too. Lastman’s recent return from his undisclosed location, which began with his labeling the current batch of councillors “a bunch of duds”, was really just a warm-up for the expansion of Bad Boy appliance stores with a reception at the Lobby bar on Bloor, suggesting a slicker sales pitch since the days of son Blayne perspiring in his prison stripe pajamas, trading lines with a Clinton lookalike. Mercifully, a thorn in the side of City Hall’s post-amalgamation era of slippery lobbyists, Adam Vaughan, has traded his reporter badge for a run at Olivia Chow’s vacated council chair, intriguingly driven by his argument that the recent overload of downtown high-rise residences will reach a crisis point once too many of the current swinging single occupants start to breed, and either bail for the suburbs, or feel lost in the urban jungle – although fears of a steel and glass sequel to St. James Town, as these clusters of condos find their value dwindling with the years, might only be pre-empted by slipping birth control ingredients into bottled water.

PREVIOUSLY: Who wants to save this plain Jane campaign?

Categories: fouronesix

7 responses so far ↓

  • Chris Taylor // May 18, 2006 at 4:01 pm

    No one is going to raise a brood of kids in downtown condos, they are waaaay too tiny. =)

  • P McVicar // May 18, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    Mr Miller must have met Robert Kennedy JR during through the vanity fair environment issue on stands now which I have neither seen nor heard any mainstream coverage of.

  • Shawn Micallef // May 19, 2006 at 5:01 pm

    I just saw the new Vanity Fair out yesterday, with Anderson Cooper on the cover. So the environmental one may be gone soon.

    I think that’s Adam’s point, about the condos. They need to make more family-sized condos. So people can have kids up high, just fine, like they do in New York City. I could see some regulation that X% of a condo must be family sized. Of course, I don’t know how the condo market works….

  • Adam Sobolak // May 19, 2006 at 7:40 pm

    People w/kids in NYC condos. The very thought gives me this weird Culkin-family vibe…

  • rick mcginnis // May 21, 2006 at 2:13 pm

    Regulating the condo market - making rules about the number and size of units and their purpose - is the sort of thing developers fight with every weapon they have; in a city like Toronto, where developers have the first and last word, it’s almost impossible to get off the ground.

    What has to be done is to convince developers that there’s a market for family condos, otherwise it just looks - or can be easily spun to look - like high-minded municipal interference.

  • rick mcginnis // May 21, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    …keeping in mind, though, that since square footage is one of the prime determinants of price, family-sized condos might price themselves out of most people’s reach in the downtown market.

  • Darwin O'Connor // May 23, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    As others have said, if there was a demand for family-sized condos, the would build them.

    Hopefully, as thier families grow they will move from the condos into the many detached and semi-detached houses that we still have downtown and the next generation of young people and empty nesters will move into the condos, replacing them.

You must be logged in to post a comment.