A provincial grant of $150K for a five-year study of mating habits of northern flying squirrels at Laurentian University in Sudbury gave the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario something to squeak about in advance of provincial budget day, although a piece in the Sunday Star and subsequent press release via PC leader John Tory was rehashing a Liberal-bashing factoid from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s annual Teddies Waste Awards – a round of annual grandstanding from the attention-starved advocacy group. The provincial funding for squirrel sex, one of many awards granted by the Ministry of Research and Innovation, was nominated alongside debacles related to auto insurance rate hikes in British Columbia and provincial funding poured into a bankrupt pulp mill in Saskatchewan. But this particular waste award category winner was the government of Manitoba, who the Winnipeg Sun accused of providing vain residents with free access to “tummy tucks and fat reducing surgeries”. The taxpayers federation later withdrew this accusation after the Manitoba health minister explained that only procedures that were medically necessary were being covered by medicare, and the hysterical CTF were forced to extend an apology “to the victims of multiple scoliosis, cerebral palsy, cancer, burn accidents or any and all other inflictions for which these procedures were necessary”. So, perhaps understanding how climate change may affect the ability of rodents to procreate in Algonquin Park isn’t a waste, especially a year after the federal government were sending police officers to the home of a Mississauga naturalist who had a pet flying squirrel imported from Indiana – the refugee “Sabrina” eventually won the fight to remain, despite fears of monkey pox that prompted Canada to turn such critters away at the border. As for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, their biggest local publicity rout of the past six months involved shredding a New York Times report that lauded Ontario for a $2.5 million investment in the stage production of Lord of the Rings – the advance box office receipts of $15 million before its official opening would suggest they’re well on their way to recouping the amount from provincial sales tax alone. But between the doctors, farmers and college folk all riled up at Premier Dalton McGuinty this week, not to mention a provincial wealth-sharing system reported to be on the cusp of implosion, picking on a $30K a year grant for an assistant biology professor is quite a curious Conservative complaint.
Frisk a frisky flying squirrel for fun and profit
March 20, 2006 · 2 Comments
Categories: fouronesix
2 responses so far ↓
Melissa // March 22, 2006 at 12:39 pm
A couple of questions for anyone that can answer them:
Is the Lord of the Rings “investment” a loan or a subsidy?
If it’s a loan, why does the government loan money? Especially if they don’t have any? Shouldn’t the Lord of the Rings people be hitting a bank up for a loan instead of the government?
This is a serious question…I really don’t understand how these things work…although I’m assuming that if it IS a loan, the government will loan money in high-risk situations when the project is thought to be in the interests of the public good (in this case, the local economy and Toronto’s oh-so-important image as a Great Cultural City(TM))…
Thanks,
—-melissa
Darwin O'Connor // March 22, 2006 at 3:46 pm
The government has to give out loans because banks and other business people in Canada are not prepared to except any risk whatsoever.
You must be logged in to post a comment.