paved :: marc weisblott

GTA Trendwatch #9: We built this city

January 2, 2006 · 3 Comments

Dundas_1
Gang-related carnage in the Downtown Yonge district risks seeming like a blight on a decade of renewal effort, but downtown Toronto’s centre of gravity was already spreading well beyond a strip of record stores anyhow. The genuinely surreal scene at Dundas Square in mid-November – where a sombre anti-gun violence rally was interrupted by a pillowfight – demonstrated the contrast between the harsher Toronto being depicted in headlines and an ongoing quest to make such exuberant extemporaneousness possible in public areas. The shortcomings of this town can usually be chalked up to bad planning – but efforts to reconstruct the housing mishap that is Regent Park, making the waterfront feel like less of a fortress, and cultural buildings engaged with the outside theoretically add up to an urban renaissance. Condominiums pitching a high-rise, high-tech and high-maintenance solitude may not do much in terms of fostering community; a kind of spirit that’s more easily roused in opposition to proposals like that millionaire monstrosity adjacent to The ROM. The vacant Planetarium is just one of several endangered High Modernist structures, the embodiment of space age optimism, whose perilous fate has moved into the spotlight – passion for the Riverdale Hospital may yet save it from demolition. What’s clear is how conversation about places and spaces has reached far beyond the architecture and development set, resulting in a period where even a ridiculous rash of graffiti on a Starbucks can provoke a genuine dialogue about the process of gentrification. No matter how much scrutiny each construction scheme receives, the spontaneous possibilities within the open source city shouldn’t let anyone down.

Categories: trendwatch05

3 responses so far ↓

  • ali // January 3, 2006 at 10:03 am

    I agree with you in that the city is pretty badly planned and could be so muhc more beautiful - and has some things to learn from, say Chicago..but I DO think some large scale projects (like the ROM) that bring in a big name with them to Toronto are good for the city’s rep and its culture..let’s hope the ‘build it and they will come’ will work because we’re definitely building!

  • Jason Paris // January 3, 2006 at 5:55 pm

    We’re definitely building on the cultural and the condo front. Where we are lacking is on the infrastructure (ie. subways, trams, Union Station refurbishment, etc.) and the office building front (although there have been a few projects recently announced).

    I think a case could be made that the centre of downtown T.O. is more in the Queen W / John area now than Dundas Square anyway. Still I like Dundas Square and I think if it’s programmed right will eventually come into it’s own. Much of the area currently looks like a construction site and that’s a huge part of the problem.

  • Dave // January 23, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    To be honest I hate those thoroughly planned US cities. They are all alike. It seems that the reason they are made that way is to prevent people from using their brains. On the other hand there are Europian cities that are oversophisticated that it’s hard to imagine how one can survive in them. I always thought that Canada was somewhere in the middle

You must be logged in to post a comment.