Tourists untrapped

Rochester_1Could the woes plaguing the Rochester fast ferry be chalked up to our diminishing interest in the United States? Not necessarily due to emerging ideological differences, but the collective weaning off 20th century media conditioning that a third-rate American town was more culturally stimulating than even the most populated Canadian one. In the case of Rochester, perhaps it was the comforting corporate legacies of Corning, Kodak and Xerox; the more exhilarating supermarkets and outlet malls; or those exotic television stations, listed with channel numbers in little white tubes, that no houses seemed to actually receive. Yet, the belated proposal of a 2006 marketing plan targeting people to spend their multi-coloured money across the border doesn’t seem terribly alluring either. Can promoting Rochester Music, Jazz and Lilac festivals possibly motivate any Torontonian to board the Cherry St. express rather than dawdling around this city in summer? Since it was Rochester who built an elaborate waterfront terminal to receive such tourists – disappointing the Bavarian beer nut and frozen custard vendors who rented space there – a proposal requesting $10 million from the city to help steady the ship’s finances is also riding on a surge of new passengers. While initially established as a year-round venture, the ferry has hastily shut down for the year, and is now being winterized three weeks ahead of schedule. Shipping a greater quantity of restless Rochesterites to the 416 area code seems the best this effort can do when it sails again April Fool’s weekend. The folks from Erie, PA venturing to launch more modest ferry rides to Ontario speak of wanting to "capture" those Canadians who are blissfully speeding past. But decades of ironic affection for a sort of Americana kitsch, as transmitted over the border from Buffalo, may be what’s run dry. 

Advertisement

6 Responses to Tourists untrapped

  1. But the point is – as I can remember – that this ferry was incepted rather for transit, not for tourists.

    This idea could have sense (cutting time for lorries and those going to – say NYC), if the price is right of course.

    Tourists?

    Well – of course Americans coming to Toronto for a day or two.

    But whoever thought that Toronto will venture to Rochester for… what????… was really crazy!

    Oh – and there was this Olympics stuff also :) )

    By the way I cannot understand why there is no ferry (or rather touristic line) to Kingston and to Niagara-on-the-Lake. Really strange.

  2. No Torontonian in their right mind would go to Rochester for a visit.

    This ferry sounded good when the possibility of knocking a couple of hours off the drive around Lake Ontario was there, but in reality it takes the same amount of time and costs way too much money to bother, so naturally, no one does it.

    Make it go faster and cheaper and I might consider it, and forget about any sort of tourist bullshit.

    Am I the only one who thought this?

  3. Just so you know that the Toronto Port Authority just issued a “Request for Design/Build Qualification” for the ferry terminal. At this rate they will be in the midst of contruction when the service is permanently mothballed.

  4. A high speed rail service from Montreal to Niagara Falls, Ontario makes more sense than tax dollars spent on a ferry terminal in Toronto.

  5. Oh yeah – high speed in Canada… When it comes? If ever?

    And why there is no electric trains/lines – at least near Toronto (GO transit)? I read all that discussion what to do to reduce pollution – and this one could surely help and make transport faster/easier.

    I’m not talking about such highly developed technology as you can find in Europe :) )) – but at least see what Americans try to do… Canada will soon remain far away.

    And what happened to this turbo train by Bombardier – probably it will zip fast in the USA first, not here…

    There is quite a lot to do in Canada….

  6. There is a tonne to do in Canada, but with the state of Amtrak and Dubya’s dislike for passenger rail, you won’t be seeing any zipping trains in the U.S. anytime soon either.

    Our P.M. is pretty anti-rail too and cancelled much of Chretien’s reinvestment into Via Rail Canada. When will they learn?

    $2.25/Litre? Maybe then.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s